Welcome to CGC Forums Announcements General Discussions Difference between services

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #57118
       CGC

      How profile customization works from one platform to another?

      The goal of this report is to summarize the customization of profiles offered by different platforms from the industry in order diferenciate their flexibility and to better understand how the things work

      Chaturbate
      Chaturbate (CB)
      The customization of bios in Chaturbate is made with HTML and inline styling. It is important to know that not all markups are accepted by the platform.
      Pro
      allows different sources for hosting images
      blocks outside the customization area are protected

      Cons

      limited to a pre-defined set of HTML markup
      limited responsiveness
      limited CSS effects (hover, animation…)
      limited Fonts
      redirect for external links
      no direct tip button/link – offline tip not possible

      MyFreeCams
      MyFreeCams (MFC)

      Profiles on MFC are separated from the streaming page and both registered members and webcam performers can customize their own page. The platform allows both HTML and external CSS stylesheet to be used for customization. The HTML can be added from profile settings in one box and the CSS markup in another box. The designers can use IDs and Classes created by MFC to style the page or even add their own.

      Pros
      flexible markup, allowing HTML and additional CSS
      flexible and responsive profile page – user customization
      image hosting, graphic components – some restrictions or limited to a list of hosting services
      iframe tag can be used for some services such as Youtube or RedTube embedded videos
      CSS3 – hover effect, animation, text effect, self-hosted fonts from Google web font library
      flexibility on adding and using additional class and id elements
      tip link/button – opportunity for offline tipping
      CSS3 responsive allowed
      external links allowed (personal website, social networks)

      Cons
      CSS character limit
      restricted iframe tag
      some restrictions for HTML5
      female webcam performers only

      MyFreeCams is offering the flexibility and opportunity for the profile owner to customize their page and it also offers the possibility to receive tips even if the webcam performer is not online in the form of tip link

      Niteflirt
      NiteFlirt (NF)

      NF platform like CB allows HTML and inline styling but doesn’t support CSS stylesheet. NF allows a wider variety of HTML tags than CB with inline CSS and external graphic elements but with a very limited length (7000 characters) which makes the profiles smaller, with less sections.

      Pros:
      allows a wider variety of HTML tags than CB
      inline CSS and external graphic elements

      Cons:
      limited to 7000 characters
      limited responsiveness
      limited CSS effects (hover, animation…)
      limited Fonts
      customization limited to webcam performers only

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.